Lynn Swann Steelers Jersey UK n4ncjppz

Rečnícky kútik - diskutuj na ľubovoľné témy - aktuálne i pálivé

Lynn Swann Steelers Jersey UK n4ncjppz

Poslaťod god7manu55 » 12 Feb 2017 03:13

… said nine-month failure was an oversightLawyers for former President Bharrat Jagdeo have been given six weeks to file an application for an appealFormer President Bharrat Jagdeoout of time. This is after the Attorneys for the former Head of State would have had some nine months to file an appeal against a ruling which allowed the defence to amend their case, but failed to do so, and another two weeks to address the same action.The failure to file the appeal during the nine-month period was described as a “tremendous oversight” by Senior Counsel Bernard De Santos when he appeared before Justice Brassington Reynolds at the High Court yesterday.The Jagdeo libel suit is also filed against the newspaper’s publisher and Editor-in-Chief Glenn Lall and Adam Harris respectively. Attorney Nigel Hughes is representing the defendants, while De Santos and his junior,Paul George Team USA Jersey, Sase Gunraj,Draymond Green Team USA Jersey, are representing the former President. Jagdeo,Terrence Ross Raptors Jersey, back in 2011 accused Kissoon of writing libelous statements against him and the newspaper was cited for publishing it.During the course of the trial,John Stockton Team USA Jersey, the plaintiff was objecting to evidence that was being provided by witnesses on behalf of the defence. De Santos was adamant that while the witnesses were providing evidence to justify the statements made by Kissoon in his column,Jason Williams Magic Jersey, they were not providing evidence that justified their information.Arguments had to be laid, therefore, by both the defence and plaintiff to represent their position in regard to the justification of evidence. Hughes had stated for the defence that he would amend their case to include the justificationKaieteur News columnist Frederick Kissoonof evidence,Evan Fournier Magic Jersey, but De Santos was against that, claiming that the defence ought to have known that they had to justify the evidence they were giving.He was also against the defence’s application to amend since the plaintiff had already closed their case and he felt that it would have been prejudicial.The court decided however to allow the defence to amend their case. De Santos decided, however, that he would appeal the ruling and he was given six weeks to do so. But this occurred in March and the case was not recalled until two weeks ago. However, the plaintiff had filed no appeal. The plaintiff had to file,Larry Bird Team USA Jersey, therefore an amended reply to Hughes’ amendment since he had failed to appeal. This too was not done.When De Santos appeared in court yesterday he asked for an adjournment so that the plaintiff could file an application for an appeal out of time. This means that in light of their failure to file the appeal or the amended response, the plaintiff is now looking to apply to the full court for leave to file the said appeal even after the time to do so,DeAndre Jordan Team USA Jersey, had elapsed.On the last occasion,Raptors Jersey, Gunraj had stated that De Santos had been engaged in the criminal assizes and that he had not been able to get guidance on how to deal with the current happenings in the case. He said that De Santos was engaged in criminal matters.This seemed somewhat “convoluted”, and pointed to time constraints. He reiterated yesterday that the failure to appeal was an oversight and that it was regrettable.Hughes argued that there were no legal grounds for any additional time to be given to the plaintiff. He said that the court indulged the plaintiff and after nine months they were still to do the necessary. Hughes objected “strenuously” to De Santos’ application and asked that the court proceed with the trialAfter the court asked De Santos a few questions and he revealed that a motion was before the full court it was decided that the plaintiff will get six more weeks before the matter is called again. The motion before the court is for the entertainment of the application to file for the appeal out of time.The two sides will return on February 2 when the court will hear the outcome of the application.The plaintiff is seeking more than $10M from the defendants.
Príspevky: 16475
Registrovaný: 26 Okt 2016 19:47
Krajina: Afghanistan (af)
Mesto: mno817

транспортерная лента

Poslaťod MichaelNip » 18 Jún 2017 09:11

транспортерная лента
транспортерная лента лента транспортера цены лента лента шевронная лента конвейерная резинотканевая гост 20 85 лента шевронная купить конвейерную ленту транспортерная лента цена полиуретановая лента виды конвейерных лент резиновая лента


820z 833n
транспортерная лента Click here>>>
Príspevky: 1283
Registrovaný: 12 Máj 2017 08:38
Bydlisko: New Zealand
Krajina: New Zealand (nz)
Mesto: 83727126541

Späť na Hyde Park


  • Príbuzné témy
    Posledný príspevok

Kto je on-line

Užívatelia prezerajúci fórum: Žiadny registrovaný užívateľ nie je prítomný a 5 hostia